Daily Tax Report: State provides authoritative coverage of state and local tax developments across the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, tracking legislative and regulatory updates,...
By Tripp Baltz
Market-based sourcing is now the norm among states.
A majority of states have migrated to market-based apportionment to source receipts from sales of services and intangibles for purposes of business income taxation, a Multistate Tax Commission attorney said.
States that have recently moved from cost-of-performance to market-based sourcing include Connecticut, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oregon, and Rhode Island, Helen Hecht, MTC general counsel, said April 24. Hecht gave an update on uniformity issues in the states during the MTC’s Spring Committee Meetings in Bloomington, Minn.
The MTC adopted regulations to implement market-based sourcing under the Multistate Tax Compact’s Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act, Article IV, Section 17 in 2017, Hecht said. Market-based sourcing is the sourcing of sales of services and intangibles to the state where the consumer receives the benefit. Nearly 30 states have adopted market-based sourcing rules for sales other than of tangible personal property, according to a February 2018 report by Deloitte.
Proposals have been put forward to adopt market sourcing in New Mexico, Kentucky, and North Carolina, Hecht said. California and Washington reportedly are working on changes to their market-sourcing regulations to follow the “benefits-received” approach, she said.
Hecht also gave an update on developments involving sales and use tax notice and reporting requirements similar to those in a 2010 Colorado law. The Colorado statute took effect July 1, 2017, after it was affirmed as constitutional by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in February 2016.
The law requires sellers that don’t collect and remit Colorado sales and use taxes to (1) notify buyers at the time of transaction that tax isn’t being collected but may be due, (2) provide consumers an annual report of their purchases, and (3) send an annual report to the state Department of Revenue showing the total dollar amount of each buyer’s purchases. The first reports were due to the state March 1.
Vermont, Washington, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, and Rhode Island have enacted similar laws, and bills have been introduced in Alabama and Hawaii, Hecht said. In some cases, state legislation requires marketplaces such as Amazon.com Inc. to either collect tax on third-party marketplace sales or file information reports, she said.
In other business, the Uniformity Committee agreed to study a proposal from Michael Mazerov, a senior fellow with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, to consider drafting a model combined reporting statute that would institute a “Finnigan” approach, reflecting a trend among states moving in that direction.
At present, the MTC has a model combined reporting statute reflecting the “Joyce” approach, Greg Matson, executive director of the MTC, told Bloomberg Tax. The model was approved by the commission in 2006 and amended in 2011, Matson said.
Joyce and Finnigan refer to two ways of calculating the sales factor numerator in a unitary combined report or consolidated return filed by a group of affiliated corporations. Under Joyce, each individual entity is regarded as the taxpayer, whereas under Finnigan the group as a whole is treated as the taxpayer. The names come from two California State Board of Equalization decisions.
Phil Skinner, member of the MTC Uniformity Committee and deputy Idaho attorney general, said he would chair a work group to do some research on Mazerov’s idea, reporting back to the MTC at its annual meeting in July in Boston.
To contact the reporter on this story: Tripp Baltz in Bloomington, Minn., at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ryan C. Tuck at email@example.com
The MTC's combined reporting model statute is at http://src.bna.com/yjg.
Copyright © 2018 Tax Management Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)