Daily Tax Report: State provides authoritative coverage of state and local tax developments across the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, tracking legislative and regulatory updates,...
Leading state and local tax practitioners expect tensions between state tax authorities and online retailers to grow as states continue to push for revenue from remote sales, leaving the courts to resolve disputes.
States and e-commerce companies have been sparring at the state level as federal lawmakers have been unable to enact legislation standardizing how cross-border sales tax should be collected. At the center of the controversy is a 1992 Supreme Court ruling, Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298, that prohibits states from imposing sales and use tax collection obligations on vendors without an in-state physical presence.
In the meantime, online sales continue to increase.
“Long term, there is going to be greater collection,” Joe Crosby, a principal at Multistate Associates Inc., said April 12 at an event sponsored by Bloomberg BNA and Reed Smith LLP. “Commerce itself is changing. The states have pursued a number of different methods to a straight up challenge” to Quill.
Many states want the ruling overturned and have been pushing to expand their ability to tax through legislative or regulatory changes. Nearly 20 states, through administrative rules or statutes, have pushed for economic nexus standards so far this year. Many retailers are resistant to a state-by-state approach that could create a hodgepodge of confusing and competing requirements.
“The reason we are frustrated and feel a sense of urgency is because our sales tax base has eroded,” Julie Magee, commissioner at the Alabama Department of Revenue, said. Alabama is “now collecting one-third of the economy in our sales tax world, where in the 70s we were collecting two-thirds of the economy.”
Magee said she used to support a federal law change to oversee online sales tax problems, such as the Marketplace Fairness Act, but it’s now “too late” and there’s little indication Congress will act this year. Now she’s looking to overturn Quill, Magee said.
Legal challenges are advancing in Alabama, South Dakota and Tennessee over their economic nexus regimes.
The South Dakota Supreme Court should reach a decision in 2017 about a statute enacted in 2016, which a lower circuit court ruled unconstitutional in March ( South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. , S.D. Cir. Ct., No. 32 Civ. 16-000092, 3/6/17 ). South Dakota lawmakers crafted the law as a vehicle to undo Quill.
“You are going to unleash a crimson tide of federal legislation by overturning Quill,” Steve DelBianco, executive director of NetChoice, a coalition of e-commerce companies and trade groups, said. “Overturning Quill unleashes the states to pursue no simplification whatsoever and to send auditors to every corner of the country.”
Sellers want to comply with tax collection and remittance laws, but the solution has to be simple, Julie Stitzel, senior manager of federal advocacy and policy at Etsy Inc., said.
Craig Johnson, executive director of the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board Inc., says he is still pushing for congressional action, because “that’s the only way you are going to get it uniform throughout the country.”
For now, Congress is unlikely to address online e-commerce issues: Lawmakers have a calendar filled with salvaging a plan to repeal the Affordable Care Act, reaching agreement on funding the government, raising the debt limit and pushing through legislation to overhaul the tax code. But that could change if the South Dakota challenge to Quill goes to the Supreme Court, Crosby said.
“I fully expect there will be a response if there is a cert petition,” he said. If a petition for certiorari is filed, “I don’t know yet what that response will be.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Laura Davison in Washington at lDavison@bna.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Meg Shreve at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 Tax Management Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)