Oct. 13 — A super political action committee seeking to overturn Federal Election Commission restrictions on a super PAC's use of a candidate's name is urging a federal court to move quickly toward a final ruling on the issue ( Pursuing America's Greatness v. FEC, D.D.C., Civ. No. 15-1217, meet and confer statement filed 10/11/16 ).
In an Oct. 11 filing with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, lawyers for the super PAC, called Pursuing America's Greatness (PAG), urged the court to adopt a schedule that would complete briefing on summary judgment by early 2017.
Meanwhile, lawyers for the FEC asked for an extended briefing schedule, including discovery, which would extend the case through most of next year.
The district court filings followed a recent federal appeals court ruling that enjoined the FEC from enforcing the PAC naming restrictions against PAG, at least temporarily. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in August that restrictions on the super PAC's use of a candidate's name in a website or social media platform was an unconstitutional restriction on speech, not a disclosure requirement, as the FEC had contended.
The six FEC commissioners deadlocked 3-3 in a vote last month on whether to appeal the D.C. Circuit panel ruling to the full appeals court (See previous story, 09/21/16).
The Justice Department has not moved to file a petition for Supreme Court review.
The August ruling by a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit overturned rules that the FEC commissioners previously had supported unanimously and that agency lawyers fought in court to preserve. The agency said that rules were needed on use of a candidate's name in order to prevent public confusion and possible fraud.
The current election cycle has seen more attention paid to PACs that purport to raise money to support specific candidates but have been disavowed by those candidates—widely known as “scam PACs.”
Ellen Weintraub, a Democratic FEC commissioner, proposed during a commission meeting last month that the FEC launch a new staff working group to examine ways to deal with scam PACs. Weintraub's call for a working group was backed by FEC Chairman Matthew Petersen following a discussion of proposals on the issue by Weintraub and fellow Democratic Commissioner Ann Ravel.
A memo from Weintraub and Ravel said efforts to control scam PACs have been complicated by the recent appeals court decision striking down restrictions on PACs use of candidate names. However, the memo noted that the D.C. Circuit decision said the FEC has “extensive” power to require that PACs include disclaimers on their communications stating that they do not speak for a candidate.
Weintraub and Ravel suggested the FEC could require a PAC's web disclaimers to be placed at the top of a web page and state clearly to donors and other viewers that, despite the names or references they see, they are not looking at information provided by a candidate's campaign committee.
The ongoing court case on PAC name restrictions arose from a plan by PAG to use the name of Republican presidential contender and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee in the name of a website and on Facebook and Twitter. After Huckabee dropped out of the presidential race, the super PAC said it had similar plans to use the names of several Republican congressional candidates, including Sens. Kelly Ayotte (N.H.) and Richard Burr (N.C.).
The super PAC raised nearly $5 million in the current election cycle, according to FEC disclosure filings, and reported about $3.5 million in independent expenditures for messages promoting Huckabee's presidential candidacy. The super PAC has made no further expenditures after Huckabee dropped out of the race earlier this year, but it has continued spending money on consulting and legal fees.
To contact the reporter on this story: Kenneth P. Doyle in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Heather Rothman at email@example.com
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)