Environment Reporter™ keeps you fully up to date on rapidly changing developments in courts, Congress, federal agencies, state legislatures, industry, and environmental organizations.
June 26 — Challenges to various aspects of the Environmental Protection Agency's greenhouse gas permitting requirements will return to a federal appeals court following a U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the scope of the permitting program.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has been waiting to hear or consider rehearing challenges to other aspects of the EPA's greenhouse gas permitting programs until after the Supreme Court made its decision. The pending lawsuits include challenges to the third step of the EPA's tailoring rule as well as potential requests to rehear lawsuits over whether facilities burning biomass must obtain greenhouse gas permits or whether states must update their air pollution implementation plans to include greenhouse gases.
The Supreme Court held June 23 that greenhouse gas emissions alone can't trigger requirements for large industrial sources to obtain Clean Air Act permits for their greenhouse gas emissions. Instead, the permitting requirements are only triggered by emissions of conventional pollutants (Util. Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA,2014 BL 172973, U.S., No. 12-1146, 6/23/14).
By overturning much of the EPA's tailoring rule, the Supreme Court's decision likely renders moot an American Petroleum Institute lawsuit challenging the third step of that rule, according to sources familiar with the lawsuit.
The EPA's July 2012 third-step rule retained the existing permitting thresholds of Title V and prevention of significant deterioration emissions permits. New facilities that emit 100,000 tons per year of carbon dioxide-equivalent and existing facilities that increase their emissions by 75,000 tons per year of carbon dioxide-equivalent will be required to obtain PSD and Clean Air Act Title V operating permits (77 Fed. Reg. 41,051).
The D.C. Circuit had been holding the American Petroleum Institute's lawsuit in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision (Am. Petroleum Inst. v. EPA, D.C. Cir., No. 12-1376, order issued 9/4/13).
The D.C. Circuit could also entertain requests from Texas and industry groups to rehear challenges to aspects of the EPA's greenhouse gas permitting program. The court had extended the window for rehearing requests until after the Supreme Court's ruling.
Forestry groups are still considering whether to ask the full D.C. Circuit to rehear a lawsuit in a case that overturned an EPA rule that had temporarily exempted facilities burning biomass from the greenhouse gas permitting requirements (Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. EPA, 722 F.3d 401, 76 ERC 2210 (D.C. Cir. 2013).
The D.C. Circuit vacated the EPA's biomass permitting deferral rule because the agency failed to demonstrate why greenhouse gases from facilities burning biomass should be treated differently from other greenhouse gas emissions.
The American Forest & Paper Association said it is still reviewing its options in light of the Supreme Court's opinion and no decisions have yet been made.
Texas, Wyoming and the Utility Air Regulatory Group could also seek rehearing after the D.C. Circuit in 2013 dismissed lawsuits challenging a requirement that states update their air pollution implementation plans to include greenhouse gases. The court dismissed the lawsuits because the petitioners failed to demonstrate that EPA's regulation caused them any injury (Texas v. EPA, 2013 BL 198472, 726 F.3d 180 (D.C. Cir. 2013).
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott's office and other attorneys involved in the litigation couldn't comment due to ongoing discussions about the cases.
To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Childers in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at firstname.lastname@example.org
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)