From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
A federal jury in Oklahoma awarded a transgender college professor $1.17 million for workplace discrimination, finding stereotypes about gender played a role in her inability to achieve tenure at Southeastern Oklahoma State University.
Rachel Tudor established that the university’s tenure denial in 2009-2010 and its decision to deny her the chance to apply for tenure in 2010-2011 were based on gender stereotyping, in violation of federal sex discrimination law, the jury’s Nov. 20 verdict said.
The latter decision by the university also was the result of retaliation for Tudor’s complaining about the earlier bias, the jury found ( Tudor v. Se. Okla. State Univ. , W.D. Okla., No. 5:15-cv-00324, jury verdict 11/20/17 ). Tudor was a tenure track assistant professor in SOSU’s English department from 2004 to 2011.
The case is noteworthy because it’s the first time a jury has ruled on a claim by a transgender worker alleging sex discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Tudor’s lead attorney, Ezra I. Young, told Bloomberg Law Nov. 21. There have been a few similar cases that were decided by way of a “bench trial” before a judge alone, but “I believe this is the first case to go to a jury at all under Title VII,” said Young, who is with the Law Office of Ezra Young in Brooklyn, N.Y.
Transgender people for a long time haven’t trusted bringing their job bias claims to a jury, he said. This decision shows “now you can,” Young said.
“Discrimination is discrimination. It doesn’t matter who you are,” Young said. A jury of Oklahomans decided it wasn’t right that Tudor was subjected to sex-based discrimination. “It really is as simple as that,” he said.
The university indicated in a statement provided to Bloomberg Law Nov. 21 that it respects the jury’s decision.
“Southeastern Oklahoma State University places great trust in the judicial system and respects the verdict rendered today by the jury. It has been our position throughout this process that the legal system would handle this matter, while the University continues to focus its time and energy on educating students. All legal questions should be directed to the Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General,’’ Sean Burrage, the university’s president, said in the Nov. 20 statement.
The state attorney general’s office told Bloomberg Law Nov. 21 that “several legal issues” remain before the court. “We decline to comment until those legal issues are resolved,” Terri Watkins, the office’s director of communications, said.
The trial before Judge Robin J. Cauthron of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma doesn’t appear to have involved the hot-button question of whether transgender workers are expressly covered under the sex discrimination provisions of federal job bias law without needing to prove illegal gender or sex stereotyping occurred, a position advanced by some federal enforcement authorities and embraced by a federal appeals court in Chicago.
The U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether to review a federal appeals court in Georgia’s decision that reached the opposite conclusion from the Chicago court, and many lawyers and advocates believe the justices ultimately will weigh in on the question in the near future if they decide not to hear the Georgia case.
The jury wasn’t—and wouldn’t—be asked to consider that question, because it’s a purely legal issue and the jury’s role is to determine the facts, Young said. The trial judge did, however, give the jury an instruction stating that Title VII doesn’t protect workers from discrimination because they are transgender, he said. The instruction provides that the jury was required to find the university acted as it did because of Tudor’s gender or because it perceived her as not conforming to traditional gender stereotypes in order to rule in her favor.
The university and the DOJ later reached a settlement of the government’s claims, and the court Oct. 17 granted the government’s motion to be dismissed from the case.
The jury rejected Tudor’s claim that she experienced a hostile work environment. She alleged that she faced daily restrictions on how she could dress and appear at work and on which restrooms she could use during the four years she worked for the university after announcing she was transitioning from male to female.
Brittany M. Novotny in Oklahoma City and Marie E. Galindo of the Law Office of Marie E. Galindo in Lubbock, Texas, also represented Tudor. The state attorney general’s office and James E. Dunn & Associates PLLC represented SOSU and the Regional University System of Oklahoma.
To contact the reporter on this story: Patrick Dorrian in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Terence Hyland at firstname.lastname@example.org
Text of the verdict form is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/United_States_of_America_v_Southeastern_Oklahoma_State_University/6?doc_id=X1Q6NU2R1582.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)