Bloomberg Law’s combination of innovative analytics, research tools and practical guidance provides you with everything you need to be a successful litigator.
By Sara Merken
July 5 — A lawsuit against a prominent Turkish scholar for allegedly instructing Turkish officials to arrest and detain 40 individuals with opposing religious views was dismissed June 29 ( Ates v. Gulen, 2016 BL 209115, M.D. Pa., No. 3:15-cv-02354, 6/19/16 ).
There was no jurisdiction under the Alien Tort Statute because the conduct alleged didn't “touch and concern” the U.S., the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania said.
Further, the Act of State doctrine—which protects the executive branch's autonomy in making foreign policy decisions—barred the claims, Judge Robert D. Mariani's opinion said.
The Muslim scholar and preacher, Muhammed Fethullah Gülen, allegedly instructed a network of police, prosecutors, and judges to plant evidence, wiretap phones and use fraudulent warrants to search the homes of members of the Doğan Movement, a religious faction with opposing views to Gülen and his 10 million followers, the complaint said.
Gülen's website says that he and members of the Gülen Movement support “interfaith and intercultural dialogue, science, democracy and spirituality and oppose violence and turning religion into a political ideology.”
The plaintiffs, three members of the Doğan Movement, alleged that Gülen published a speech on a Turkish website and approved content on two episodes of a nationally-broadcast television show to advise the officials on what actions to take, the complaint said.
But the court found that Gülen's speech didn't, on its face, have any direct instruction to detain Doğan members. The plaintiffs provided only “circumstantial and tenuous allegations,” and the broad assertions didn't point to specific parts of the speech that conveyed instructions to Turkish officials, the court said.
There wasn't subject matter jurisdiction over the ATS claims because the allegations didn't demonstrate conduct that “touches and concerns” U.S. territory, the court said.
All the relevant actions took place in Turkey, and the only tie to the U.S. is that Gülen recorded the video speech in Pennsylvania, where he lives, the court said.
The plaintiffs' claims were also barred by the Act of State doctrine, which “requires evaluation whenever adjudication of a controversy might hinder the executive department in the conduct of foreign relations,” the court said.
“Such an invitation by Plaintiffs to sit in judgment of the decisions of Turkey's political, law enforcement, and judicial officials also invokes exactly the type of foreign-policy determinations that the Supreme Court has warned federal courts to avoid,” it said.
The court declined to address a First Amendment argument.
Courts are “way too restrictive when it comes to the Alien Tort Statute,” Patrick J. Egan, attorney for the plaintiffs with Fox Rothschild LLP, told Bloomberg BNA.
“We are disappointed because we feel like the individuals have valid claims and they suffered very significant harm as a result of what happened,” he said.
But Gülen's counsel disagreed. “This decision brings to an appropriate end a lawsuit that should never have been filed,” attorney Michael Miller said in a statement published June 29 by Steptoe and Johnson LLP.
Fox Rothschild LLP and Amsterdam & Partners LLP represented the Doğan Movement members.
Steptoe & Johnson LLP represented Gülen.
To contact the reporter on this story: Sara Merken in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jessie Kokrda Kamens at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)