When something sells well, does that necessarily prove it’s an inventive product that consumers have been clamoring for? Or just that it’s a good deal?
For Hubbell Inc., commercial success wasn’t enough to convince the Federal Circuit that its weatherproof electrical outlets should be patented. Especially considering that Hubbell was selling the outlets for a fraction of a competitor’s price.
This week, the court decided (In re Hubbell Inc., No. 2015-1222, 2016 BL 109362 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 7, 2016)) that strong sales couldn’t overcome a base case that Hubbell’s patents were invalid for obviousness.
And it had a pretty good reason for ignoring Hubbell’s evidence, noting that the weatherproof outlets were “priced significantly lower than” a competitor’s unpatented product. In fact, you could buy Hubbell’s patented products for less than half the price of an unpatented one.
Given Hubbell’s pricing strategy, it takes a certain amount of chutzpah to argue that higher unit sales prove that a related invention isn’t obvious.
It’s not that sales can’t ever figure in a patent’s favor. Four years ago, the Federal Circuit emphasized (Mintz v. Dietz & Watson, Inc., 679 F.3d 1372, 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1897 (Fed. Cir. 2012) that “secondary considerations” such as commercial success can best prove nonobviousness “where the invention is less technologically complex.”
“Less technologically complex” would certainly seem to fit in the Hubbell case, given that one of the prior art patents used to build the case for obviousness was issued in 1925. But the Hubbell court noted that price and “a myriad of other factors” might be behind a product’s commercial success. That didn’t reverse any precedent but is still pretty far removed from its comment in Mintz.
Of course, the burden is still on an alleged infringer to rebut evidence of commercial success. Surely, those defenders can be expected to build up their lists of “myriad” factors in the next few years.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)