From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
Organized labor is trying to continue its fight against the Trump labor board’s recent reversal on “joint employer” liability in federal court, arguing in a filing Jan. 4 that the board’s decision was “defective.”
The motion, which was brought by the Teamsters union and co-written by former Obama NLRB member Craig Becker, asks the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider its Dec. 22 order remanding to the labor board the precedent-setting Browning-Ferris Industries case. The litigation concerns when multiple companies can be held legally liable for unlawful treatment of workers.
The Teamsters argues that board member William Emanuel should’ve recused himself from the board case that overturned the precedent set in Browning-Ferris because his former law firm represented a company involved in the Browning-Ferris case.
“Clearly, he could not have participated in Browning-Ferris,” Becker, now counsel to the AFL-CIO, told Bloomberg News Jan. 4. “But here, while Browning-Ferris is still pending he—through this other case—overturns the decision in Browning-Ferris, so it has exactly the same effect” as though he hadn’t properly recused himself from Browning-Ferris, Becker, who is general counsel of the AFL-CIO, told Bloomberg News Jan. 4.
The joint employer issue has been a lightning rod for business groups, unions, and employees, and getting the Obama precedent reversed was a key priority for industry groups. The level of concern about joint employer was “similar to thirty minutes before the planes hit the World Trade Center,” Shelly Sun, the chair of the International Franchise Association, told Bloomberg News in May.
“You knew they were coming, and you would have done anything to try to stop them. Ours is kind of the equivalent of that to the franchising industry,” Sun said. “The franchising industry ceases to exist if we don’t get joint employer defined and rolled back to the standard that we’ve all relied on.”
The union also said the new board case— Hy-Brand Industrial Contractors, Ltd.,—is likely to be appealed, and so it’s improper to rely on that decision to remand Browning-Ferris. The court granted the National Labor Relations Board’s motion to send the case back before the union, which intervened in the case, or some other party had a chance to oppose the request, the Teamsters said.
Attorneys representing Browning-Ferris didn’t immediately respond to Bloomberg Law’s request for comment.
The Teamsters’ Jan. 4 filing contends that the majority-GOP NLRB’s December ruling in Hy-Brand Industrial Contractors, Ltd. wrongly used that case as a vehicle to overturn the Obama-era Browning Ferris decision.
The board stretched its analysis to answer a question it hadn’t been presented with, since it decided in Hy-Brand that the company was a “single employer,” according to the union. That made the board’s decision to address the joint employment question “both unnecessary and nonsensical,” the Teamsters said in the filing.
Becker suggested that the board’s decision to issue Hy-Brand along with a spate of other major policy reversals at the end of 2016 may have been imprudent.
“It’s not at all unusual that there is a spurt of decisions before a member’s term ends,” he said. “What’s unusual, and I would say unprecedented, is the number of major decisions the Board issued in the last three days of the former chairman’s term, which involved very important issues in which a precedent was overturned and in none of which did they give notice to interested parties and an opportunity to brief.”
The union attorney added that “someone would surely have made a motion to recuse” against Emanuel if the board had given more notice.
Browning-Ferris industries hasn’t yet formally responded to the motion.
Copyright © 2018 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)