Daily Labor Report® is the objective resource the nation’s foremost labor and employment professionals read and rely on, providing reliable, analytical coverage of top labor and employment...
July 29 — A National Labor Relations Board official couldn't obtain an injunction against a corn products processor because the company's alleged labor law violations haven't caused a union to lose any of its members, a federal district court in Iowa held ( Osthus v. Ingredion, Inc., 2016 BL 244459, N.D. Iowa, No. 16-CV-38-LRR, 7/28/16 ).
The case suggests that some courts remain skeptical about the agency's need for injunctive relief in cases that don't involve obvious and egregious unfair labor practices.
The NLRB regional director alleged that Ingredion Inc. violated its duty to bargain in good faith with an Iowa local of the Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers, and committed other unfair labor practices.
But Judge Linda R. Reade of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa decided July 28 the agency wasn't entitled to an injunction under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act.
The NLRB regional director didn't show that there would be any irreparable injury if a preliminary injunction isn't in place while the board resolves the merits of the unfair labor practice case against Ingredion, Reade said.
Ingredion purchased Penford, a corn milling plant in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in 2015, the court said. BCTGM Local 100-G has represented employees at Penford plant since the 1940s. There are presently 150 to 165 bargaining unit employees.
Ingredion, which does business in Iowa as Penford Products Co., recognized the union, but the parties have been locked in contentious negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement.
The negotiations began with the union proposing modifications to its existing agreement (referred to as the “Red Book”), which was set to expire in 2015, while Ingredion proposed new contract terms, which the company eventually incorporated into a “last, best, and final” offer to the union.
Union members rejected the employer's offer, and Ingredion unilaterally implemented changes that affected overtime, insurance, and other terms and conditions of employment.
Acting on unfair labor practice allegations by the union, the NLRB's general counsel issued a complaint against Ingredion. An administrative law judge held a hearing in April, but he hasn't yet issued a decision.
The NLRB regional director also filed a petition for injunctive relief under Section 10(j), 29 U.S.C. § 160(j), which authorizes federal district courts to enjoin the commission of unfair labor practices during the pendency of NLRB proceedings.
The NLRB official alleged that the company bargained in bad faith with Local 100-G and unlawfully made unilateral changes in employment conditions by implementing its offer.
The regional director also alleged the company undermined and denigrated the union by making coercive statements and comments to employees away from the bargaining table.
The NLRB official argued a Section 10(j) injunction was needed to prevent Ingredion from illegally accomplishing what it couldn't do lawfully—impose its contract terms on the union.
Reade found that in “cases where preliminary injunctions have been granted, there have generally been allegations of more egregious behavior than in the instant action.”
She said “there is no evidence that the Union is losing members as a result of the alleged unfair labor practices or that such loss is likely to occur in the future.”
Union members testified in the Section 10(j) proceeding that they are worse off under the terms Ingredion implemented than those they had under the Red Book, Reade said. But she said it wasn't the court's role “to judge whether the union employees' grievances are the product of unfair labor practices.”
Finding the NLRB's evidence didn't show that irreparable harm would likely occur without a federal court injunction, she denied the board's petition for injunctive relief.
NLRB attorneys in Minneapolis represented the regional director. Faegre, Baker, Daniels LLP attorneys in Des Moines, Iowa, and Indianapolis represented Ingredion.
To contact the reporter on this story: Lawrence E. Dubé in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Susan J. McGolrick at email@example.com
Text of the opinion is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Osthus_v_Ingredion_Inc_No_16CV38LRR_2016_BL_244459_ND_Iowa_July_2.
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)