From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
A class of black former MetLife financial services representatives will have their choice of two different payment methods under a $32.5 million settlement of their race bias claims against the global insurance provider, their lawyer told Bloomberg BNA ( Creighton v. Metro. Life Ins. Co. , S.D.N.Y., No. 1:15-cv-08321, letter filed 7/5/17 ).
The unique approach to the distribution of a class settlement fund permits class members to pick a quicker, more traditional payment calculated based on their years with Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. or its subsidiary, New England Life Insurance Co., and their length of service in the industry overall, attorney Linda D. Friedman said July 6. Alternatively, they can choose a longer individual claims process that also takes into account additional factors, including the alleged discrimination the class member faced personally and how it affected him or her in terms of career or reputational harm, Friedman said.
There are two advantages to the latter option, Friedman said. First, it can lead to a more equitable monetary award for the class member, as the harm someone experiences as a result of workplace discrimination depends on more than just how long they worked for a particular employer or in a particular industry. Second, because of the personal nature of discrimination, it also provides “more procedural justice,” she said.
“It’s a more thoughtful process” that involves the class member presenting evidence of his or her personal circumstances before one or more “neutral” hearing officers who will decide how much of the $32.5 million settlement fund should be paid to the person, she said.
In court, employees claiming job bias get to tell a jury what they went through. The alternative claims process set forth in the settlement agreement with MetLife gives class members who choose to do so a similar chance to recount their story, Friedman said.
Her firm—Chicago-based Stowell & Friedman Ltd.—included similar provisions in an earlier class settlement involving a different financial services company, she said. The class members in that case who chose the individualized claims route “thought they got tremendous value” out of the procedural justice and opportunity to tell their story, Friedman said.
So far, to her knowledge, she said, no one else has structured a discrimination class settlement in this way.
MetLife didn’t admit to any liability under the settlement, according to the agreement. Class members will be required to sign a broad release of their legal claims as a precondition to sharing in the settlement fund.
“At MetLife, we are committed to promoting a diverse and inclusive workplace and do not condone discrimination,” Kim Friedman, a company spokesperson, said in a July 6 email to Bloomberg BNA. “We are pleased that our effort to work together with some of our former Financial Services Representatives to find a resolution was successful.”
The settlement provides relief to all black financial services representatives who worked for or were affiliated with Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. or New England Life at any time between May 15, 2011, and July 1, 2016.
The class alleged that MetLife and New England Life discriminated against black financial services representatives in the distribution of customer accounts and teaming opportunities. Those practices resulted in black representatives being paid less than their white counterparts based on race, the class asserted.
The lawsuit was spurred by a discrimination charge filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by lead plaintiff Marcus Creighton in May 2015.
Judge William H. Pauley III of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York gave his final blessing to the settlement June 27. That followed a June 21 hearing before the court.
Pauley ordered separate awards for Creighton and the other six named plaintiffs to compensate them for their services in representing the class. Those amounts—$75,000 to Creighton and $50,000 to each of the others—are to be paid from the class fund.
Unlike some judges, Pauley generally doesn’t make such service awards, Linda D. Friedman said. At the June 21 hearing, he indicated that he was moved to make an exception in this case because of the “considerable effort” made on behalf of the class by each class representative. He also cited the fact that in making such an effort, the class representatives each needed to “come forward and subject themselves to public scrutiny,” potentially adversely affecting their future job prospects in the financial industry, according to a hearing transcript.
The court also determined that $7.15 million of the settlement fund should be set aside for payment of class counsel’s legal fees and expenses. Of that amount, counsel will receive half—$3.575 million—as payment of attorneys’ fees to date and an additional $78,870 for accrued court costs. The remainder of the fees-and-costs set aside will be paid to counsel as Pauley sees fit through what promises to be a time- and labor-intensive class-claims-processing period.
At the June 21 hearing, the judge indicated that class counsel has “performed exceptional work throughout” and that the $32.5 million settlement amount topped the highest similar settlement in 2016 by more than $10 million.
Friedman filed a letter with the court July 5 asking for more time to get word out about the court’s final approval—and the time for filing a “simple,” traditional claim form or the “detailed” form required to participate in the individualized claims process—to the nearly 700 black financial services representatives entitled or potentially entitled to share in the settlement. The final class size is expected to be somewhere between 650 and 690, she said.
A court order indicating that final notice of the settlement had to be mailed to potential class members by July 6 miscounted the days and didn’t account for the July 4 holiday, the letter says. The correct date should be July 12, and the full period is needed to make sure all interested workers are alerted, the letter said.
The incorrect notice date was a simple mistake, Friedman said. She told Bloomberg BNA she doesn’t expect the court to have any concern with changing it to July 12.
Suzanne E. Bish and George S. Robot of Stowell & Friedman also represented the class. Steven J. Pearlman in Chicago and Keisha-Ann G. Gray in New York, both of Proskauer Rose LLP, represented MetLife.
To contact the reporter on this story: Patrick Dorrian in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
Text of the settlement agreement is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Creighton_v_MetLife_Securities_Inc_et_al_Docket_No_115cv08321_SDN/1?doc_id=X1Q6NSLKIEO2&imagename=120-2.pdf. The final approval order is at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Creighton_v_MetLife_Securities_Inc_et_al_Docket_No_115cv08321_SDN/2?doc_id=X1Q6NSLKHAO2&fmt=pdf, and class counsel's letter is at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Creighton_v_MetLife_Securities_Inc_et_al_Docket_No_115cv08321_SDN?doc_id=X1Q6NSLKHK82&fmt=pdf.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)