Bloomberg BNA’s Corporate Law & Accountability Report is available on the Corporate Law Resource Center. This news service keeps corporate practitioners informed of legal developments of...
Oct. 25 — Corporate America may be told to change its ballots as U.S. voters gear up to cast theirs.
The corporate equivalent of absentee ballots, known as proxy cards, could include candidates for board seats put forth by management as well as competing nominees from investors under rule changes to be considered Oct. 26 by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Having one “universal” proxy ballot, rather than two separate ones as is typically done now, could change the stakes in activist campaigns.
“In recent years, some have asked why in a proxy contest there are two dueling proxy cards instead of one card with all of the director candidates listed,” said Elizabeth Ising, a partner in Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP’s Washington office who counsels public companies on shareholder activism issues. Ising likened it to Election Day, when voters can “pick and choose” among candidates on the ballot.
“The SEC’s current rules limit the ability to use a single proxy card for all candidates in a contest,” Ising told Bloomberg BNA.
Universal ballots are seen as a way to level the playing field for retail and institutional investors who can't easily show up to vote in person.
“This is about freedom of choice,” Amy Borrus, deputy director at the Council of Institutional Investors, said. The council petitioned the SEC in 2014 to require universal ballots in contested elections (13 CARE 532, 3/13/15).
“In a proxy fight, investors should be able to vote for the director nominees they want to represent them, regardless of which slate those candidates are on,” Borrus told Bloomberg BNA.
The trend today is toward fewer fights and more settlements between boards and activist investors, according to State Street Global Advisors. Less than 10 percent of board seats conceded in an activist campaign in 2015 and 2016 were the result of a proxy contest, down from 34 percent in 2014.
“Right now, it’s expensive, you have to hire lawyers and solicitors, and there’s no guarantee that you’ll win,” said Keir Gumbs, a Washington-based attorney who was former counsel to an SEC commissioner and now vice chair of Covington & Burling LLP's Securities and Capital Markets Practice Group. “Your chances go up dramatically” if companies are required to include an activist’s nominees alongside theirs, he told Bloomberg BNA.
If the SEC proposes changes to its proxy rules, the details that may be sorted out include: when universal ballots can be used, whether they would be mandatory and what the eligibility requirements would be for shareholders who want to use them.
The commission’s investor advisory committee has recommended making universal ballots optional and only for use in “short slate” elections, when outside candidates wouldn't control the board if elected. Mandatory use, the committee said, “could be viewed as a new form of shareholder proxy access.”
About 40 percent of S&P 500 companies have adopted some form of proxy access, which typically allows investors who own at least 3 percent of stock for three years to nominate their own board candidates on the company’s proxy ballot.
“Universal ballot is proxy access on steroids,” Tom Quaadman, executive vice president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness, told Bloomberg BNA. Boards could end up with members who aren't acting in the best interests of shareholders or the company, he said.
Congressional Republicans have already tried to block the SEC from working on universal ballots by attaching a rider to a House-passed funding bill (90 CARE, 12/17/15). The White House has threatened to veto the legislation.
To contact the reporter on this story: Andrea Vittorio in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Yin Wilczek at email@example.com
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)