The International Trade Practice Center on Bloomberg Law® provides in one comprehensive, time-saving resource.
China has breached market access commitments for rice, wheat and corn exports, the U.S. alleged in a World Trade Organization (WTO) challenge.
At the same time, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative Dec. 15 advanced a separate case by asking the WTO to set up a panel to examine China’s level of domestic support for rice, wheat and corn. The WTO Dispute Settlement Body will consider the panel request Dec. 16.
“Compliance with WTO rules would lead to a reduction in the excessive domestic support provided to China’s grains producers to bring Chinese production in line with market forces, and improvements to China’s TRQ administration would facilitate market access for U.S. and other exporters of these commodities,” according to USTR.
Under a tariff rate quota (TRQ), a low-tariff rate applies to imports up to a specified quantity. A higher tariff rate applies to imports above that amount.
The U.S. request for consultations on China's tariff rate quotas formally launches the dispute. If after 60 days, consultations don't resolve the dispute, the U.S. can ask for a dispute settlement panel.
A U.S. victory in the excessive support case could force China to reduce its agricultural subsidies or face retaliatory trade tariffs worth tens of billions of dollars.
The new complaint marks the 15th WTO enforcement challenge the Obama administration launched against China. The case comes against a backdrop of increased trade tensions between the U.S. and China.
Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle praised the action. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-Texas) said the case is “huge step forward” for American farmers, adding that he looks forward to “working with the next Administration as we step up our actions to hold China accountable.”
National Association of Wheat Growers (NAWG) President Gordon Stoner said the facts of the two cases “go hand-in-hand, demonstrating how Chinese government policies create an unfair advantage for domestic wheat production.” NAWG is a federation of 22 state wheat grower associations.
China’s administration of its tariff rate quotas limit opportunities for U.S. farmers to export high-quality grains to China, USTR Michael Froman said in the statement. U.S. rice, wheat and corn exports produce an estimated $70 billion in economic activity and support 200,000 U.S. jobs, USTR said.
China agreed to allow 2,660,000 metric tons (MT) of short- and medium-grain rice; 2,660,000 MT of long-grain rice; 9,636,000 MT of wheat; and 7,200,000 MT of corn to enter China at lower duty rates through its tariff rate quotas, USTR said.
A separate trade dispute involving phytosanitary measures has prevented the U.S. from shipping rice to China, according to a USTR official, who spoke to reporters on background. Technical work on an agreement to resolve this issue has been completed, but it must still be signed, the official said. At the same time, China has failed to meet TRQ obligations for rice, the official said.
The total annual value of these tariff rate quotas was $2.99 billion for wheat, $ 1.13 billion for short- and medium-grain rice, $1.01 billion for long-grain rice and $1.90 billion for corn, USTR said.
“Real access under tariff-rate quotas is vital to global trade and to providing our farmers and ranchers the opportunity to export high-quality, American-grown products to the world,” Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said in the release. China has become a significant market for U.S. grain exports, but U.S. farmers could be doing much better, he said.
USTR said China's administration of its tariff rate quotas for rice, wheat and corn “is not transparent, predictable or fair.” Further, China “appears to have breached” trade obligations by maintaining impermissible import restrictions and failing to provide notice of the total quantities permitted to be imported.
The tariff rate quotas, which are necessary to import medium- or short-grain rice, long-grain rice, wheat and corn at lower duties, consistently aren't fully used despite conditions favoring importation of grains into China, USTR said. Last year alone, China would have imported as much as $3.5 billion worth of additional crops if the tariff rate quotas had been fully used, according to USTR. A USTR official told reporters during a conference call that prices are much lower for the imported grain than China-produced grain, and that this market situation indicates that the TRQ should be filled.
Similarly, in a statement, U.S. Wheat Associates President Alan Tracy said “consider[ing] that China's domestic wheat prices are more than 40 percent higher than the landed cost of U.S. wheat imported from the Pacific Northwest, it would be logical to assume the TRQ would be fully used if the system were operating fairly, transparently and predictably as the rules intend.”
The U.S. sought consultations with China on Sept. 13 on its domestic support for rice, wheat and corn. Consultations failed to resolve the issue.
USTR estimated that China’s market price support for these commodities was nearly $100 billion above its WTO commitments. Excessive support for rice, wheat and corn inflates Chinese prices above market levels. This, in turn, creates artificial government incentives for Chinese farmers to ramp up production, USTR said.
Officials at China's Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
To contact the reporter on this story: Rossella Brevetti in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jerome Ashton at firstname.lastname@example.org
More information is available from USTR at https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2016/december/united-states-challenges-chinese.
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)