The International Trade Practice Center on Bloomberg Law® provides in one comprehensive, time-saving resource.
By Brian Flood
U.S. duties on Chinese solar cells and modules will remain in place, after a Federal Circuit Court of Appeals panel Jan. 22 struck down a challenge brought by a group of Chinese companies and their affiliated U.S. importers.
The ruling came on the same day that the Trump administration announced it would apply “safeguard” measures over four years to imports of solar products from around the world, and that it would engage in negotiations “that could lead to positive resolution” of the anti-dumping and countervailing duties on Chinese solar products.
The president imposed safeguard duties ranging from 30 percent in the first year down to 15 percent in the fourth, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) said.
The three judges upheld the International Trade Commission’s finding that the Chinese products directly caused injury to domestic U.S. solar producers.
Plaintiffs Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Yingli Green Energy Holding Co., and their U.S. affiliates tried to convince the panel that the commission didn’t give enough consideration to other factors that could have hurt the industry, such as competition with natural gas and a decline in government subsidies for solar-energy products. But the judges found that the commission had adequately addressed those concerns and still found that the Chinese imports drove down prices and cost U.S. producers market share.
In recent administrative reviews of these duty orders, the Commerce Department assigned anti-dumping duty rates of 5.82 percent to 238.95 percent, and a countervailing duty rate of 13.93 percent.
John Rogers, senior energy analyst at the nonprofit Union of Concerned Scientists, told Bloomberg Law that these duties were a big factor in the U.S. turning away from China as a source of solar product imports in recent years. Now China accounts for only about 20 percent of U.S. solar products imports.
The fact that manufacturing shifted from China to other Asian countries in the wake of these tariffs was a major impetus for the push for “global safeguards” on solar modules and cells not just from China, but from around the world, said M.J. Shiao, head of Americas Research at GTM Research, a market analysis firm.
U.S. producers Suniva Inc. and SolarWorld Americas Inc. sought these rarely invoked trade measures, claiming that competition from solar imports contributed to the closure of nearly 30 U.S. production facilities in the industry since 2012 and operating losses of $865 million.
On Jan. 22, USTR announced that the president decided on a four-year safeguard measure, starting with tariffs of 30 percent in the first year, and scaling down to 15 percent by the fourth year. The first 2.5 gigawatts of imported solar cells will be exempt from the safeguard tariff in each of those four years, according to USTR.
Rogers told Bloomberg Law that solar products manufacturing make up only about 15 percent of total U.S. solar employment. Other parts of the industry, including solar installers, have been very concerned about the possible negative effects of safeguards, he said.
In announcing the safeguard measures, USTR also said that it would engage in discussions “among interested parties that could lead to positive resolution of the separate anti-dumping and countervailing duty measures currently imposed on Chinese solar products and U.S. polysilicon.”
After the duties were put in place, “China moved production elsewhere and evaded U.S. relief, while maintaining capacity,” said USTR. “Today, China dominates the global supply chain and, by its own admission, is looking to increase its capacity to account for 70 percent of total planned global capacity expansions announced in the first half of 2017.”
The case is Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n , Fed. Cir., No. 2016-1053, 1/22/18 .
To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Flood in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor on this story: Jerome Ashton at email@example.com
Copyright © 2018 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)