Pension & Benefits Daily™ covers all major legislative, regulatory, legal, and industry developments in the area of employee benefits every business day, focusing on actions by Congress,...
The U.S. Supreme Court vacated April 22 an appeals court decision that a welfare benefit plan could not restrict a court's traditionally broad equitable powers to determine what constitutes “appropriate equitable relief” under Section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act(CGI Technologies and Solutions Inc. v. Rose, U.S., 12-240, cert. granted 4/22/13).
In June 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit determined that a plan administrator was not entitled to full reimbursement under ERISA Section 502(a)(3) for medical benefits paid to a participant. The Ninth Circuit concluded that “appropriate equitable relief” under Section 502(a)(3) allowed it to fashion an equitable remedy that included equitable defenses the plan expressly disclaimed.
The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated, and remanded the Ninth Circuit's decision in light of the court's April 16 decision in US Airways Inc. v. McCutchen, U.S., No. 11-1285 (2013) (74 PBD, 4/17/13). In McCutchen, the Supreme Court determined that equitable principles cannot override a plan's clear reimbursement provisions, but may be used to construe ambiguous or absent plan terms.
Rhonda Rose was employed by CGI Technologies and participated in its ERISA-governed self-funded welfare benefit plan. The plan's subrogation and reimbursement clause provided CGI with a right to full reimbursement for medical expenses paid to a participant from any funds recovered from a third-party tortfeasor, exempted CGI from any responsibility for attorneys' fees paid for any recovery, and required full reimbursement regardless of whether the participant was made whole by the recovery.
Rose was seriously injured in a car accident in 2003 and received $32,000 in medical expenses from the plan. Rose, with the assistance of counsel, filed a $1.76 million personal injury claim against a third party and eventually recovered $376,907. CGI demanded reimbursement following the personal injury recovery.
Rose refused to reimburse the plan and her attorneys placed the disputed funds in trust. CGI then filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington seeking “appropriate equitable relief” under ERISA Section 502(a)(3). The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment.
The district court granted partial summary judgment to CGI after determining that it was entitled to full reimbursement of the medical expenses it paid under the plan. However, the district court also determined that CGI was responsible for a proportional share of Rose's legal fees. The parties appealed.
The Ninth Circuit examined the district court's decision that CGI was entitled to full reimbursement. The appeals court found that it had broad powers under ERISA Section 502(a)(3) and that it “need not honor the express terms of the Plan where traditional notions of equitable relief so require.”
The appeals court went on to vacate the district court's decision granting CGI full reimbursement for its medical expenses, According to the Ninth Circuit, the district court should have determined “appropriate equitable relief” by applying traditional equitable principles, including equitable defenses such as the make-whole and common-fund doctrines.
CGI filed a petition for writ of certiorari in August 2012 and asked the Supreme Court to resolve whether the Ninth Circuit erred by holding that courts may use equitable principles to rewrite contractual language and refuse to apply provisions requiring participants to fully reimburse plans.
Rather than addressing CGI's specific question, the Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated, and remanded the Ninth Circuit's decision following Supreme Court's McCutchen decision, which prevented equitable principles from overriding the plan's clear reimbursement provision. The McCutchen decision will also prevent the Ninth Circuit from directing the district court to apply the make-whole and common-fund doctrines, which the plan expressly disclaimed.
The petition for certiorari was filed by Noah G. Lipschultz of Littler Mendelson, Minneapolis.
The full text of the Ninth Circuit's opinion is at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/CGI_Technologies_and_Solutions_v_Rhonda_Rose_et_al_Docket_No_1135. The full text of McCutchen is at http://op.bna.com/pen.nsf/r?Open=jwie-96tk5t.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)