Daily Report for Executives provides in-depth coverage of unfolding legislative, regulatory, and judicial news from the nation’s capital, the states, and around the world. This daily news service...
By Casey Wooten
The Agriculture Department’s Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration is pushing back implementing Obama-era rules that would rework contract regulations between livestock produces and processors.
In a stakeholder notification sent out April 11, the USDA said it would delay the effective date for the regulations, known as GIPSA Rules, from April 22 to Oct. 19. The USDA also pushed back the deadline for public comments to June 12.
“The extension allows ample time for stakeholders to review the effects of the Scope Interim Final Rule on their operations, and ensures maximum opportunity for dialogue across every segment of the livestock, meat, and poultry industries,” GIPSA Acting Administrator Randall Jones said in the notification.
The delay casts doubt on whether the White House—which ran on a platform of cutting federal regulation—will implement the rules in the version published last year. Notably, the new memo didn’t use the Obama administration’s name for the regulations, the Farmer Fair Practices Rules.
Released Dec. 14, 2016, the GIPSA final rules would overhaul the scope of Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Act regulations on “unfair or discriminatory trade practices” by livestock processors.
The rule establishes that it is not necessary to demonstrate that a trade practice harms the entire industry in order to prove a violation of the Packers and Stockyards Act rules governing unfair trade practices among processors, who contract with livestock producers. That could make it easier for livestock farmers to sue large processing companies.
The rule also addresses what critics have called undue preference in the tournament-style system in which poultry processors pay producers.
Chicken processors like Tyson Foods Inc. and Perdue Farms Inc. contract with individual chicken farmers, who then raise livestock owned by the processors. Farmers are paid using a competitive system in which prices are set based on the size and quality of the livestock raised.
Some critics of the system say that it places all the risk on the farmers and that pay between producers can very widely. Processors say the system keeps prices low for the consumer.
The GIPSA rules have been in the works for nearly a decade. They were first mandated as part of the 2008 farm bill, but lawmakers have blocked their implementation in subsequent appropriations legislation.
However, in a measure to fund the federal government in late 2015, Congress did not include language blocking the GIPSA rules from advancing and the USDA moved to finalize the rules.
“The Obama administration made the imprudent decision to finalize this rule on their way out the door,” Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) said in a statement supporting the department’s delay. “I hope the Trump Administration’s USDA will finally heed the concerns of farmers and ranchers and the Congress to get rid of this unneeded and unwanted rule.”
Livestock groups like the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association have asked the USDA to halt the rule altogether as well. The NCBA praised the department’s decision to push back implementation.
“This is another step toward common sense and away from counterproductive government intrusion in the free market,” NCBA President Craig Uden said in a statement. “That said, while a delay is welcome, ultimately this rule should be killed and American cattle producers should be free to market our beef without the threat of government-sanctioned frivolous lawsuits.”
Some farm groups, such as the American Farm Bureau Federation, have backed the rules, however.
To contact the reporter on this story: Casey Wooten in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Paul Hendrie at pHendrie@bna.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)