U.S. double tax negotiations with India are at an impasse, according to IRS Deputy Commissioner (International) Michael Danilack. At the Pacific Rim Tax Institute in Palo Alto, Danilack—the U.S. Competent Authority—blasted his counterpart in India for taking the position “that we should ignore cost plus arrangements, that risk allocation does not matter, that we should look past cost plus and go straight to profit split.” Danilack also criticized the Indian official for attempting to advance a policy agenda during negotiations when “it is not clear that his agenda is in fact the position of the Indian government.”
This is not the first time negotiations with a foreign competent authority have reached a standstill. Practitioners reported a similar situation with Canada in 2004, saying at the time that Canadian negotiators were taking inconsistent positions designed to maximize Canadian revenue in every case, disallowing deductions for intangibles routinely permitted by other tax authorities, and even failing to negotiate in good faith. U.S. and Canadian officials attempted to solve the situation by setting out an appeals process for cases in which negotiators failed to agree on the facts six months after the initial meeting in a case. Eventually, the two nations agreed to a mandatory, binding provision in their treaty under which cases unresolved after two years must go to an independent arbitration panel—and that appears to have worked well.
But arbitration is not likely to appear in a treaty with India anytime soon. Anita Kapur, Director General of Income Tax in New Delhi, was quoted in late 2010 as having strong objections to the use of arbitration in resolving bilateral disputes, and there have been no indications since then that her position has changed. Kapur said the process is unfair to developing counties because in an arbitration, a multinational company “supported by the best legal brains and abundant resources can be pitted against a developing country with limited resources, so this is a fight between two unequal parties.”
Molly Moses, Managing Editor, Transfer Pricing Report
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)