International Trade Daily™ provides rapid, reliable notification of the most significant developments affecting U.S. trade and international business policy, as well as the policies of major U.S....
Oct. 17 — Countries should no longer ignore the rise of China's trade-distorting farm subsidies, the top U.S. trade official, Michael Froman, said in Geneva.
“When major emerging economies are providing trade-distortive agricultural subsidies at a greater volume than all of the developed countries put together, we can no longer turn a blind eye,” Froman said Oct. 17 during speech sponsored by the Geneva Graduate Institute.
“We have found that China is providing nearly $100 billion per year in highly trade-distortive subsidies above and beyond their WTO limits,” U.S. Trade Representative Froman said. “How can we have a serious conversation about distortions to global agricultural trade if we pretend that trade-distortive subsidies at this level don't exist?”
Froman's remarks may further dampen expectations for a near-term World Trade Organization agreement to reduce domestic support policies in line with the goals of the Doha Development Agenda.
Last month the U.S. filed a WTO dispute against China for allegedly violating the terms of its 2001 accession agreement by providing more than $100 billion in trade-distorting domestic support in excess of its WTO commitments (178 ITD, 9/14/16).
The U.S. case alleged that between 2012 and 2015 Beijing supported farmers at levels that were substantially above China's WTO commitment to cap such subsidies at 8.5 percent of the value of production.
WTO rules generally permit countries to maintain de minimis levels of domestic support of up to 5 percent of the value of production for developed countries and up to 10 percent for developing countries.
Though China is considered a developing WTO country, it agreed to a stricter level of 8.5 percent as part of its 2001 WTO accession agreement.
Chinese Ambassador to the WTO, Yu Jianhua, urged Froman to consider the disparity between the per capita difference in subsidies offered to U.S. and Chinese farmers during a question and answer session.
“One fact we must not ignore as far as domestic support is concerned — for each Chinese farmer they receive less than $100 in subsidies, while the U.S. gives more than $20,000 in subsidies for each farmer,” Jianhua said.
Froman responded that “that's why we have green boxes and amber boxes and that's why some subsides are considered trade-distorting and other subsidies are not.”
Under WTO rules amber box support, also known as aggregate measure of support (AMS), is considered the most trade-distorting form of subsidization because of its direct links to prices and production. Green box subsidies are not considered to be trade-distortive.
“We put a proposal on the table last year to try and get the conversation going on domestic support,” Froman said. “It did not attract a consensus among WTO members but we are open to ideas and continue to talk about the need to address that issues as well as and in the context of addressing other issues such as market access.”
Geneva trade officials say an agreement on farm subsidies is crucial to advancing any package of trade deals at the WTO's 2017 ministerial meeting in Argentina.
Since 2001, WTO members have sought to achieve “substantial reductions” of trade-distorting domestic support, in line with the goals of the Doha Development Agenda.
Despite the ambitions of the Doha Round, its domestic support pillar has ranked among the most deadlocked areas of the agriculture negotiations, in part because of the dramatic increases in payments from large, emerging economies like China and India.
Earlier this month, the chairman of the WTO's agriculture negotiating committee, Vangelis Vitalis, noted that he had seen no shift in that the state of the negotiations—which largely hinge on the willingness of China and the U.S. to modify their farm subsidies policies.
To contact the reporter on this story: Bryce Baschuk in Geneva at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jerome Ashton at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)