For over 50 years, Bloomberg Tax’s renowned flagship daily news service, Daily Tax Report® has helped leading practitioners and policymakers stay on the cutting edge of taxation and...
Lobbyists for publicly owned utilities are fighting to preserve advance refunding bonds—repealed in both the House and Senate tax reform proposals—to prevent the loss of billions in savings.
The bonds are “a significant tool that municipal issuers are using and have used with great frequency” over the last five years, said Emily S. Brock, director of the Government Finance Officers Association’s Federal Liaison Center.
According to data provided to Bloomberg Tax by GFOA, public water and sewer utilities issued about $45 billion in advance refunding bonds from 2012 to 2016. Over the same period, public power utilities issued about $20 billion in such bonds and gas utilities almost $51 million.
The bonds allow municipal issuers to take advantage of lower interest rates by refinancing an existing bond issue with a new one. Advance refundings, as distinct from current refundings, occur when the outstanding—refunded—bonds remain outstanding for more than 90 days from the date the refunding bonds are issued. Under current law, municipal issuers may engage in a tax-exempt advance refunding only once over the life of the bonds.
Current refundings, which would still be allowed under the tax reform proposals, occur when the refunded bonds are redeemed within 90 days from the date the refunding bonds are issued.
Generally issuers won’t “pull the trigger” for advance refundings unless they see at least 3 to 5 percent in savings on a present value basis, Brock said.
John Godfrey, senior director of government relations at the American Public Power Association, said at a minimum that translates to $600 million in savings for public power utilities over the last five years, based on the $20 billion in advance refunding bond issuances.
“That’s a big number; it’s real money,” he told Bloomberg Tax. So getting rid of the ability to use advance refunding bonds is a “concern to us,” Godfrey said. (For a road map of where to find key provisions and compare the House tax reform bill ( H.R. 1) with the Senate Finance Committee version, read Bloomberg Tax’s analysis.)
And while current refundings would still be allowed, being forced to meet the 90-day window could be problematic, Godfrey said. “It takes a while to wind these deals up.”
Having advance refunding provides more flexibility and more opportunity for reducing costs, he said.
Advance refundings can also mean more money for infrastructure projects, said Phillip C. Gildan, a principal shareholder at Greenberg Traurig LLP.
“When you lower debt service costs, you can use those extra capital dollars to fund more infrastructure,” Gildan, who is a senior fellow for Public Private Partnerships and Infrastructure Delivery at the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, told Bloomberg Tax.
Savings on debt service “ultimately benefits taxpayers,” several associations, including the GFOA and APPA, wrote to lawmakers in a Nov. 10 letter.
In 2016, the advance refunding of more than $120 billion of municipal securities—by all public issuers, not just publicly owned utilities—saved taxpayers at least $3 billion, the groups said.
If advance refunding bonds are repealed, “municipal bond issuers would be challenged to manage interest rate risks and the cost of borrowing for state and local governments would skyrocket,” the Bond Dealers of America said in a Nov. 15 letter to Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah). Higher costs would mean “increasing taxes for everyone regardless of income level,” contrary to the stated goal of the tax reform package, the BDA said.
In a Nov. 15 letter to House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.), the BDA said that denying the tax exemption for municipal bond advance refundings would “likely drive many issuers into the swaps and derivatives markets to find new ways to manage debt issued for infrastructure and capital improvement.”
Brock said the GFOA was surprised by the advance refunding provisions because in the approximately 90 visits the group had with lawmakers on Capitol Hill, repeal of advance refunding bonds was never brought up.
“It’s like a freight train right now, and we’re doing everything we can” to prevent that change, Brock said. “The utilities sector has been extremely active in grassroots organizing and reaching out, and I hope that this extraordinary effort will pay off in the end.”
Lawmakers who champion municipal bonds—like those in the Congressional Municipal Finance Caucus, which includes both Democrats and Republicans—should want to preserve advance refundings, Brock said. “It’s important that we continue to tell them that these are traditional municipal issues and they are being impacted in this tax reform legislation.”
Doug MacGillivray, director of government affairs for the American Public Gas Association, said the APGA is involved in discussions with both the House and the Senate and wants lawmakers to maintain advance refunding bonds, among other things.
“We are supportive of whatever can drive down costs or make it easier to finance projects like pipelines,” he told Bloomberg Tax.
To contact the reporter on this story: Allyson Versprille in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Meg Shreve at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)