Pension & Benefits Daily™ covers all major legislative, regulatory, legal, and industry developments in the area of employee benefits every business day, focusing on actions by Congress,...
By Carmen Castro-Pagan
Jan. 12 — The anti-assignment clause in Verizon Communications Inc.'s welfare benefit plan bars an out-of-network health-care provider's claims under ERISA to recover unpaid benefits, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled.
In affirming the district court's decision to dismiss the provider's complaint against Verizon, a three-panel judge held that the participants' assignment of benefits to the provider was void and unenforceable because the plan's terms included a valid anti-assignment clause.
The Jan. 12 unpublished decision is the fifth since December issued by the Eleventh Circuit in a stream of cases filed by Dr. W.A. Griffin, a Georgia dermatologist, on similar grounds (1 PBD, 1/4/16).
In December, the appeals court upheld the anti-assignment clauses of plans sponsored by Southern Co. Services Inc., Focus Brands Inc., Health Systems Management Inc. and General Mills Inc. Cases against Lockheed Martin Corp., Habitat for Humanity International Inc. and SunTrust Banks Inc. are still pending in the appeals court docket.
Just as the Eleventh Circuit decision was issued, Griffin filed a new complaint against Verizon on Jan. 11. She now brings a claims under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act alleging civil rights violations. She claims that Verizon discriminated against her by denying her derivative standing under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act because of her gender and race.
Griffin provided emergency and medical services to two patients insured by a health plan administered and sponsored by Verizon. Blue Shield Blue Cross Georgia was the claims administrator.
The insured patients executed an assignment of benefits to Griffin. When she submitted the claims to Blue Cross for payment, it denied coverage on one and underpaid the second.
After completing the administrative appeals procedure, Griffin filed a lawsuit against Verizon with ERISA claims for alleged unpaid benefits, breach of fiduciary duty and failure to provide plan documents.
The district court granted Verizon's motion to dismiss, ruling that Griffin lacked standing under ERISA based on the plan's anti-assignment clause.
The appeals court noted that even though ERISA doesn't prohibit a participant or beneficiary from assigning benefits to a provider, an anti-assignment clause in a plan—which limits or prohibits a participant or beneficiary from assigning her right to payment of benefits—is valid and enforceable.
As a result, an anti-assignment provision can bar a participant or beneficiary from assigning benefits to a provider, meaning the provider can't acquire a cause of action under ERISA, the court said.
Since a valid and enforceable anti-assignment clause was part of Verizon's plan terms, the insureds' assignments of benefits to Griffin were void, the court ruled.
Griffin argued that the anti-assignment clause was inapplicable because Georgia law required the insureds to assign their benefits to her.
The court rejected her argument. It said that the Georgia statute guaranteed only that if benefits were payable to an in-network provider under a plan, the plan also had to pay benefits to out-of-network providers to whom the patients assigned their rights. Nothing in the Georgia statute required an insured to assign her benefits to a medical provider, the court concluded.
The court also rejected Griffin's argument that because Blue Cross failed to disclose the anti-assignment term, Verizon was equitable estopped from relying on the anti-assignment clause, or had waived it.
The court concluded that equitable estoppel didn't apply because there wasn't any evidence that Verizon or Blue Cross made representations to Griffin interpreting the anti-assignment clause.
The court also said that Griffin failed to allege sufficient facts to show that Verizon waived the anti-assignment clause. The court concluded that her allegations that Blue Cross failed to inform her of the anti-assignment provision was insufficient to establish a “clear case” that Verizon intentionally and voluntarily relinquished its rights under the anti-assignment clause.
The per curiam opinion was joined by Judges Beverly Martin, Jill A. Pryor and Lanier Anderson III.
Griffin represented herself, pro se. Verizon was represented by Troutman Sanders LLP.
To contact the reporter on this story: Carmen Castro-Pagan in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jo-el J. Meyer at firstname.lastname@example.org
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)