From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
A Waffle House worker must convince an arbitrator, rather than a federal judge, that a class action he filed against the breakfast restaurant chain before he was hired belongs in court, not arbitration, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled ( Jones v. Waffle House, Inc. , 2017 BL 274658, 11th Cir., No. 16-15574, 8/7/17 ).
The decision deals with the question of who decides the common issue of whether employment-related claims are subject to an arbitration agreement between a worker and an employer. The twist here is that William Jones filed his lawsuit against Waffle House Inc. before he was hired by one of the franchise’s stores in Kansas City, Mo., based on a previous denial of employment at a Florida Waffle House.
Jones filed the lawsuit in federal court in Florida in October 2015 on behalf of himself and a proposed class under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act. He alleged that he and other job applicants were turned away for employment based on the results of background checks performed for Waffle House without being given a copy of the results or a chance to challenge them before being rejected.
But he continued to apply for work with Waffle House and later was hired by the Kansas City store in February 2016. When hired, he signed Waffle House’s arbitration agreement and didn’t mention anything about his lawsuit to Waffle House personnel in Missouri or anything about being hired to his lawyers, Judge Frank M. Hull said.
Waffle House eventually learned of Jones’ hire and, citing the arbitration agreement, asked the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida to send his case to arbitration based on the agreement’s provision requiring Jones to arbitrate all “past, present, or future” employment-related claims. The district court denied the company’s motion. That was error, the Eleventh Circuit said.
An arbitrator, not a court, is to decide whether Jones’ FCRA claims are subject to arbitration, under the arbitration agreement signed by Jones, Hull said. The agreement, Hull found, contains an express “delegation” provision reserving gateway issues such as the arbitrability of a claim to an arbitrator in the first instance.
When an arbitration agreement includes such a delegation provision, courts only have jurisdiction to review a challenge to that specific provision, the Eleventh Circuit said. In this case, Jones never specifically challenged the delegation provision in Waffle House’s agreement. Even if he had, his arguments would have failed, the appeals court ruled, remanding the case with instructions for the district court to grant the company’s motion to compel arbitration.
The delegation provision was written in clear, comprehensible language and Jones agreed to it voluntarily, the court said. Given that Jones didn’t disclose his lawsuit to the Kansas City Waffle House and didn’t tell his class-action lawyers about his new job, “Jones had the upper hand” and couldn’t show the sort of unequal bargaining power or other unfairness needed to undercut an arbitration clause, the court said.
Judges Stanley Marcus and Raymond C. Clevenger III joined the opinion.
Eggnatz Lopatin & Pascucci LLP and CounselOne represented Jones. Troutman Sanders LLP and Fisher Rushmer P.A. represented Waffle House.
To contact the reporter on this story: Patrick Dorrian in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
Text of the opinion is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/William_Jones_v_Waffle_House_Inc_et_al_Docket_No_1615574_11th_Cir?doc_id=X1Q6NSV39E82&fmt=pdf.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)