Daily Tax Report: State provides authoritative coverage of state and local tax developments across the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, tracking legislative and regulatory updates,...
By Ryan Prete
South Dakota has “manufactured an entirely inappropriate vehicle” for the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider its 25-year-old decision restricting states’ ability to tax remote retailers, according to online retailers challenging the state’s digital tax law.
The Dec. 7 brief in opposition—from e-commerce companies Wayfair Inc., Overstock.com Inc., and Newegg Inc.—argued that the high court should deny South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley’s (R) request for review of a state Supreme Court ruling that found the state’s “economic nexus” law, S.B. 106 (codified as S.D. Codified Laws Chapter 10-64), unconstitutional under Quill Corp. v. North Dakota—the 1992 Supreme Court ruling that prohibits states from imposing sales and use tax collection obligations on vendors without a physical presence in-state.
Through a “fast track” appeal, South Dakota is enlisting the Supreme Court to “provide what amounts to an advisory opinion on a barren factual record, contrary to this Court’s proper constitutional role and its carefully-circumscribed jurisdiction,” according to the retailers’ brief.
“In the process, the State runs roughshod over principles of stare decisis, disregards significant concerns of retroactive liability, and fails to establish facts sufficient for this Court to evaluate the complex and delicate balance between the burdens of imposing nationwide sales and use tax obligations on interstate businesses, on the one hand, and the States’ interest in requiring companies located beyond their borders to serve as the States’ use tax collectors, on the other,” the brief stated.
The response follows a flurry of 15 friend-of-the-court briefs supporting South Dakota’s petition, according to the Supreme Court’s website. At least six briefs backing the online retailers’ opposition brief were filed Dec. 7—one brief filed on behalf of several congressional members included Reps. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.) and Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), who have both supported federal legislation to codify the Quill physical presence rule.
The lawyers representing the retailers didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
“Congress is the proper institution to address this complex issue,” the online retailers argued, highlighting three bills pending in Congress:
A bipartisan coalition of U.S. senators and representatives—including Sensenbrenner and Goodlatte, sponsor and co-sponsor of the NRRA, respectively—likewise argued that “since the states refuse to solve their use tax collection problem themselves, the only provident decision for this Court to take is to deny the petition and leave it to Congress to pursue its fuller and more appropriate means of arriving at a solution.”
Many individuals, both inside and out of Congress, have singled out Goodlatte as the primary roadblock to e-commerce proposals expanding states’ taxing authority. Goodlatte, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, announced Nov. 9 that he won’t seek re-election in 2018.
Both the online retailers and other parties argued that there are factual flaws with South Dakota’s claims.
“The State’s fundamental premise for why Quill should be revisited is that circumstances in the retail marketplace have dramatically changed since Quill was decided,” according to the retailers’ brief. “Instead, accepting that Quill controlled the outcome, the State conceded summary judgment in order to press this appeal. As a result, there is no record on which this Court can evaluate the continuing vitality of the Quill standard.”
NetChoice, a Washington-based internet commerce trade association, also claimed that South Dakota’s argument lacks factual evidence.
“Petitioners present no facts regarding the burden (or lack thereof) of multistate sales and use tax collection on interstate commerce,” according to NetChoice’s friend-of-the-court brief. “South Dakota’s ‘legal argument’ consists largely of its own opinion, without factual evidence to support, that changes in computer technology, streamlined sales and use tax laws, and the evolution of the retail industry have made Quill obsolete,”
NetChoice’s general counsel echoed the association’s concern over South Dakota’s “fact-free” argument.
“South Dakota continues to disregard Supreme Court precedent and masquerade opinions—without facts to support them—as legal arguments,” Carl Szabo, NetChoice vice president and general counsel, said in a statement emailed to Bloomberg Tax. “South Dakota rushed to the Supreme Court but forgot to bring any facts. It is clear that only the U.S. Congress has the legislative power to enact internet taxation. This is nothing but an attempted illegal power grab by the state of South Dakota.”
Despite the significant volume of briefs filed—including a brief filed by a coalition of 35 states and the District of Columbia in support of South Dakota’s petition—it’s still not certain that the high court will grant review.
“I think that short of Bush v. Gore, there is nothing that the Supreme Court will surely take up,” Jamie Yesnowitz, principal and state and local tax practice and National Tax Office leader at Grant Thornton LLP, told Bloomberg Tax.
Yesnowitz gave the high court a 25 percent chance of granting review, a figure he called “relatively high.”
“Well, I was pretty skeptical at first, but now I’m convinced that Wayfair has a decent chance of being granted,” Lila Disque, deputy general counsel for the Multistate Tax Commission, told Bloomberg Tax. “I think the most compelling fact is that so many states signed on to an amicus brief together. This really emphasized the importance of the case and the need for a standard that better reflects the modern workplace.”
Bloomberg Tax received additional briefs from the following groups:
The case is South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. , U.S., No. 17-494, respondents’ brief in opposition filed 12/7/17 .
To contact the reporter on this story: Ryan Prete in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Cheryl Saenz at email@example.com
Text of the opposition brief is at http://src.bna.com/uMQ.
Copyright © 2017 Tax Management Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)