From the 8/19/16 issue of Weekly State Tax Report:
The time has come for the United States Supreme Court to determine whether states who are parties to the Multistate Tax Compact (compact) can repudiate with impunity their obligation to provide taxpayers the option of apportioning their income using the method afforded to them in the compact.
Gillette's attempt to enforce the compact's apportionment election has received much attention since the beginning of its important litigation in California. In essence, Gillette has correctly tried to avail itself of the standard, three-factor apportionment formula—consisting of equally weighted property, payroll, and sales—that is at the heart of the compact, of which California was (and perhaps still is) a member. The Franchise Tax Board, on the other hand, has wrongly argued that Gillette was required to use the state's modified formula, double-weighting the sales factor, “notwithstanding” California's compact membership.
After winning at the court of appeal, Gillette's fortunes swiftly changed before the California Supreme Court, which—perhaps sensing the substantial impact to the fisc and the disruptive effect upon the status quo—ruled that California was not bound by the terms of the compact. Gillette's bid for review before the U.S. Supreme Court has continued to garner interest from friend and foe alike. Several non-parties have weighed in as friends of the court, each with their own reasons as to why the high court should or should not review the California Supreme Court's decision.
Marty Dakessian, founder of Dakessian Law, Ltd. and Don Griswold, partner at Crowell & Moring, discuss support for Supreme Court review of Gillette in this week’s BNA Insights article, available here (subscription required). Or sign up for a free trial to the Weekly State Tax Report.
Compiled by Chreasea Dickerson
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)