From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
Wells Fargo is unlawfully hindering the U.S. government’s investigation of suspected widespread sexual harassment of female employees, the EEOC said in a federal court filing ( EEOC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , D. Md., No. 1:17-cv-02583, subpoena enforcement action filed 9/6/17 ).
The case involves the hotly debated question of whether and when the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission may continue a probe into alleged workplace bias after the original charging party has resolved or withdrawn her allegations or lost her claims. For example, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held in August that the agency could continue to investigate possible race bias in hiring by Union Pacific Railroad Co. despite the employees who first brought the alleged discrimination to the EEOC’s attention having lost their separate private claims against the railroad.
That ruling added to a divide among the federal appeals courts as to whether the commission is permitted to extend a workplace bias investigation beyond the date it issues a right-to-sue letter to the original charging party.
In its Sept. 6 filing against Wells Fargo, the agency says the bank has refused to turn over personnel files and other documents regarding a potential hostile work environment for women created by a male supervisor’s repeatedly staring at female employees’ chests and otherwise harassing them. The agency said it requested the information after an initial investigation into a female worker’s charge of discrimination revealed that the same supervisor had similarly harassed other women and that the bank knew of the recurring misconduct.
The EEOC asked the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland to enforce a subpoena requesting the documents from Wells Fargo Bank N.A. The woman who originally filed the charge, Alice Frey, and the bank apparently settled the allegations shortly after the EEOC served its initial request for the information, the agency said.
Wells Fargo has since refused to cooperate in the agency’s effort to look beyond Frey’s individual charge and into the potential harassment of a class of women, the EEOC said.
The agency’s investigator spoke to a witness subsequent to Frey’s apparent settlement with the bank. The witness confirmed that supervisor Robert Pellicot sexually harassed Frey and generally made women uncomfortable by staring at their chests while speaking with them, the EEOC said. And it was Frey who initially sparked the EEOC’s interest in expanding the investigation by providing details of other female Wells Fargo employees who were harassed or discriminated against based on sex, the agency said.
Frey has never withdrawn her charge, despite her purported settlement with Wells Fargo, and her “alleged” attorney hasn’t entered an appearance in the EEOC’s investigation, according to the agency.
The EEOC’s subpoena demands that the bank produce all harassment complaints against Pellicot, the identity of other employees who were supervised by Pellicot or who worked with Frey, and the contact information for all those employees. It also seeks Pellitcot’s and Frey’s personnel files and information as to whether Pellicot still works for Wells Fargo, and the reason he left the bank if he no longer works there.
The EEOC Sept. 7 declined to comment on the petition when contacted by Bloomberg BNA.
Representatives for Wells Fargo didn’t comment on the case when contacted by Bloomberg BNA.
Attorneys in the EEOC’s Baltimore office represent the commission. No attorney had filed an appearance yet for Wells Fargo.
To contact the reporter on this story: Patrick Dorrian in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)