The gold standard of excellence for more than 80 years, The United States Law Week® is the most authoritative way to keep up with important cases and other legal developments nationwide, in all...
A Latin cross located on public property at a busy intersection, erected to honor local soldiers who died in World War I, violates the First Amendment’s establishment clause, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled Oct. 18 ( Am. Humanist Ass’n v. Md.-Nat’l Capital Park & Planning Comm’n , 4th Cir., No. 15-2597, 10/18/17 ).
The 40-foot tall cross has the primary effect of endorsing religion and excessively entangles the government in religion, the court said in an opinion by Judge Stephanie D. Thacker.
Becket Fund Deputy General Counsel Eric Rassbach told Bloomberg Law that the court’s discussion of the “reasonable observer” test is extreme and “declares open season on monuments across the country that include Latin crosses.” The Becket Fund filed an amicus brief in the case supporting the state.
There are a number of “cross-in-a-park” cases pending in other courts that may be swayed by this opinion, Rassbach said. But if any of them come out the other way, the U.S. Supreme Court may be forced to weigh in on the issue, he said.
The opinion is important because it has a good discussion concerning the meaning of the cross, the length of time it has been in place, and the importance of the government’s maintenance of the cross, Patrick Charles Elliott, Freedom From Religion Foundation, Madison, Wis., told Bloomberg Law.
The opinion is also consistent with how other courts have treated similar cases, he said. The FFRF filed an amicus brief in the case supporting the plaintiffs.
The project to fund and erect the cross was started in 1918 by a private organization, which required donors to recognize the existence of one god. The American Legion took over the project in 1922, and it was completed in 1925.
Over the years, prayer services and even Sunday worship services have been held at the cross. But it’s also used for veteran-focused activities.
In 1961, Maryland obtained title to the cross and its land, because it had safety concerns. The state now maintains and repairs the cross.
The cross sits on a one-third acre traffic island in a busy intersection. The American Legion symbol is affixed near the top of the cross and an American flag flies nearby. Its base is inscribed with the words “valor,” “endurance,” “courage,” and “devotion.” There is a 2-foot by 9-foot plaque that lists the names of the 49 soldiers from the community who died during the war. The plaque, however, is illegible to passing motorists.
The intersection is part of memorial park honoring local veterans of several wars. The surrounding monuments, however, are located from 200 feet to a half-mile away.
Plaintiffs, non-Christian residents of the county in which the cross is located and a nonprofit association that advocates for the separation of church and state, argued that the cross amounts to a governmental affiliation with Christianity. The district court ruled that the cross has a secular purpose, neither advances nor inhibits religion, and doesn’t have a primary effect of endorsing religion.
Maintaining and preserving a war memorial is a legitimate secular purpose, the appeals court said. Even though the Latin Cross is a preeminent symbol of Christianity, the history of this cross is “semisecular,” it said.
The display has gone unchallenged for over 90 years, has nonreligious elements and sits among other, scattered, war memorials, the court noted.
But the nonreligious elements are either obscured or dwarfed by the size of the cross, which is 30-feet taller than the other memorials, it said. It also rejected the argument that the longer a violation goes unchallenged, the less violative it becomes.
The “historical meaning and physical setting of the Cross overshadow its secular setting,” and the reasonable observer “would fairly understand the Cross to have the primary effect of endorsing religion,” the court said.
There is also excessive entanglement in this case, the court said. The state owns the cross and has already spent $117,000 to maintain it and has another $100,000 set aside for restoration, it said.
Displaying this cross, with its size, history, and context, is excessive entanglement because the state is displaying the hallmark symbol of Christianity in a way that places Christianity above other faiths, the court said.
Judge James A. Wynn Jr. joined the opinion.
Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory dissented, arguing that the memorial honors the lives lost by local residents in World War I and that “a monument so conceived and dedicated and that bears such witness violates the letter or spirit of the Constitution these heroes died to defend.”
Monica Lynn Miller, Washington, represented the American Humanist Association. William Charles Dickerson, Riverdale, Md., represented the state.
To contact the reporter on this story: Bernie Pazanowski in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jessie Kokrda Kamens at firstname.lastname@example.org
Full text at http://src.bna.com/tti.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)